Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(2127 KB)

Mid-term evaluation of the lowering emissions in Asia's forests (LEAF) program

2013EnglishEvaluation report' | Title in footer: LEAF mid-term evaluation report | Evaluated project title: Lowering emissions in Asia's forests (LEAF) PollutionSoutheast Asia Vietnam Thailand

Metadata

Authors
Hess, David | Turner, Allen | et al.
Contract/Code
AID-486-TO-13-00004 | RAN-I-00-09-00019-00 | AID-RAN-I-00-09-00019 | AID-486-A-11-00005
Institution
11933 - Social Impact, Inc. 11460 USAID. Regional Development Mission Asia (RDMA) | 13413 Bur. for Policy, Planning and Learning. Ofc. of Learning, Evaluation Research
Keywords
Greenhouse gas emissions | Forestry | Pollution | Climate change | Landscape conservation | Gender integration | Land use | Deforestation | Economic growth | Natural resource management RF40 Development program and activity evaluation (1890.0) | Climate change (1322.1) | Natural resources (General) (583.0)
ID
PDACY434
File size
2127 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

The purpose of the mid-term performance evaluation of owering Emissions in Asia's Forest (LEAF) program is to examine progress to date, to identify implementation challenges and areas for improvement and to recommend specific opportunities to enhance effectiveness and impact.  The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Regional Development Mission for Asia (RDMA) Regional Environment Office (REO) created and funded LEAF to address climate change in a continuously evolving context of initiatives across the region?s countries and landscapes.  Therefore, this evaluation seeks to advise RDMA on: (1) options for LEAF to best achieve its results while contributing to RDMA's emerging Regional Development Cooperation Strategy (RDCS) and in harmony with bilateral Missions and their strategies and programs, and (2) how best to focus future USAID program resources for RDCS results achievement.  As an evaluation that looks both forward and backward from the mid-point of the LEAF project, the LEAF evaluation used a non-experimental design based on qualitative data and a cross-sectional evaluation process.  It looked at multiple subgroups, including women, youth and minority ethnic groups, at one point in time and across six different countries.  The main data collection tools were document review, semi-structured key informant interviews (KIIs) and group discussions.  Limitations that were overcome included availability of informants, recall and absence of baselines.  (Excerpt, modified)