Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(936 KB)

Powering progress project : end of project performance evaluation report : final report

2013EnglishCover title: Powering progress project : end of project evaluation report | 'Submitted to: USAID/East Africa' | Also known as: USAID/East Africa technical support to the East African power pool end of project evaluation | Evaluated task order title: Powering progress project (PPP) | Evaluated project title: Energy II indefinite quantity contract(Energy II IQC) Energy economicsEast Africa South Of Sahara Kenya

Metadata

Contract/Code
AID-623-TO-10-00002 | AID-EPP-I-00-03-00007 | EPP-I-00-03-00007-00
Institution
40359 - Sewa Business Services, Ltd. 12598 USAID. Mission to East Africa
Keywords
Contracting | Contractors | Electricity | Electrification | Institutional sustainability | Public opinion | Trade | Utilities FA50 Energy technology (540.9) | Alternative energy technology (422.1) | Energy (General and research) (207.2)
ID
PDACW314
File size
936 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

This report is the end of project performance evaluation for the Powering Progress Project (PPP) funded by USAID/EA at a cost of US$ 2,104,953 and implemented by Nexant Inc. between April 2010 and July 2012.  The evaluation was conducted by Sewa Business Services Limited in the period between November 30, 2012 and February 5, 2013.  The purpose of PPP was to provide technical assistance and capacity building support to key entities in Eastern Africa (Burundi, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Egypt, Ethiopia, Libya, Kenya, Rwanda, Sudan, Tanzania and Uganda) and to establish a regional electricity market.  Nexant was largely effective and efficient in implementing PPP as it produced most of the deliverables in time and at no additional cost; more staff were trained than planned; their support in bilateral power trade and crossborder electrification (CBE) agreements was useful.  However, a few challenges hindered effective implementation of the PPP.  These included limited presence of the PPP Nexant staff in the region, which posed communication challenges and affected engagement levels between the contractor, EAPP and the beneficiaries.  (Excerpt, modified)