Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(8104 KB)

Final performance evaluation report of two democracy and governance projects

2013EnglishCover title | Title in footer: Final performance evaluation of the HICD and ISP projects | Evaluated project title: Human and institutional capacity development (HICD) | Evaluated project title: Institutional strengthening program (ISP) Civil societyCODE: 524; Nicaragua Latin America Brazil

Metadata

Authors
Bruch, Anabella | Fajardo, Raul | Rodrigues, Maria Augusta
Contract/Code
AID-524-O-12-00005 | RAN-I-00-05-00026-00 | AEP-A-00-01-0004-00 | 524-A-00-08-00003-00
Institution
8584 - USAID. Mission to Nicaragua
Keywords
Accountability | Civil society | Evaluation | Management | Organizations | Social conditions | Transportation JA34 Civil society (2496.25) | Democratization (1958.0) | Development program planning and management (1115.0)
ID
PDACU915
File size
8104 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

The objective of this evaluation was to perform the final performance evaluations of two Democracy and Governance Office projects. In addition, the evaluation was to: provide USAID with information and analysis to help make management decisions in a changing political environment and whether, when, and how to continue future support to Nicaraguan civil society organizations (CSOs). The key evaluation questions were: (2) what is the general status of civil society in nicaragua?; (2) what are the views of local civil society about whether these two activities were relevant to them?; (3) how effectively have these programs coordinated with USAID or other donor programs to achieve overall strategic objectives?; (4) how did the civil society partners and beneficiaries of these programs interact with the broader political and governmental environment and how were they affected by it?; (5) should the mission design and implement a similar future program (or programs) to the activities being evaluated? what are the strengths and weaknesses of these programs?; (6) how has reduction or withdrawal of donor assistance impacted civil society?; (7) how did the different roles and status of women and men within the community, political sphere, workplace, and household affect the work that was undertaken?; and (8) how did the anticipated results of the work affect women and men differently?  (Excerpt, modified)