Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(326 KB)

Mid-term review of USAID SEADI project, support for economic analysis development - Indonesia

2012EnglishInside title: Mid-term evaluation for support for economic analysis development in Indonesia (SEADI) Program, working with the National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas) under the assistance agreement economic growth programs in Indonesia | "This evaluation was contracted under: USAID contract number: BPA SOL-OAA-11-000086, project order ID # INDONESIA_DB_052912" | Footer title: Mid-term review of USAID SEADI project | Evaluated task order title: Support for economic analysis development - Indonesia (SEADI) Final report Economic policyCODE: 497; Indonesia

Metadata

Authors
Brunell, David
Contract/Code
AID-497-TO-11-00005 | AID-EEM-I-00-07-00009 | EEM-I-00-07-00009-00
Institution
35 - U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)
Keywords
Economic development | Economic growth DA40 Development program planning and management (250.0) | Rule of law (29.75) | Development cooperation (16.0)
ID
PDACU721
File size
326 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

This is a midterm evaluation of the Support for Economic Analysis Development in Indonesia (SEADI) Program, working with the National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas) under the Assistance Agreement Economic Growth Programs in Indonesia.  The overarching objective/spirit of this assessment is to go beyond a typical project retrospective report card, to learn from the experience of all project stakeholders, and apply these insights for the purposes of: (1) taking the SEADI project to its most promising level over its second half term; (2) creatively improving the focus, delivery, efficacy, impacts and potential outcomes of project activities; (3) ensuring that SEADI and mission economic growth agenda and program activities are strategically synergistic; and (4) considering the rationale, focus and agenda for a follow-on project building on cumulative SEADI achievements through mid-2013.  Some of the many observations outlined in the evaluation include: (1) the SEADI project overall, and all major components, are now meeting and in many cases exceeding all contract specified outputs and work plan activity/achievement indicators; (2) grants initially lagged but are now on track and will be limited only by funds obligated and expended within the brief duration of the contract; (3) scholarships awards were slow and behind schedule during the first year for other reasons as well; (4) overall, most counterparts enthusiastically confirm the quality/value of SEADI services and its "demand/need driven" process; (5) SEADI's work-products, deliverables and conduct of operations and activities, are of sound to excellent professional world standard; and (6) advisor, consultant and staff performance are commendably strong.  The evaluator makes many recommendations, including: (1) focus GOI/USAID mutual interests more strategically on impacting priority integrative cross-cutting development themes; and (2) take seriously the old adage: "Better to do fewer things well (in more depth), than too many not so well" (too shallowly).  Included in these recommendations are several relating to the USAID contracting officer's representative (COR).  (Excerpt, modified)