Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(648 KB)

Mid-term evaluation of the community livelihoods project (CLP)

2012EnglishTask order number 1 | Evaluated project title: Community livelihoods project (CLP) | AID-RAN-I-09-00016 Socioeconomic developmentCODE: 279; Yemen

Metadata

Authors
Merschrod, Kris | Warman, Arthur
Contract/Code
RAN-I-00-09-00016-00 | 279-A-00-10-00032-00
Institution
1891 - International Business and Technical Consultants, Inc. (IBTCI) 13413 USAID. Bur. for Policy, Planning Learning. Ofc. of Learning, Evaluation Research
Keywords
Community development | Livelihood | Community based delivery | Community mobilization | Women | Urban areas | Civil society | Economic development | Health care | Agricultural development | Primary education UA40 Agricultural management (435.0) | Communities (318.45) | Land reform (80.0)
ID
PDACU525
File size
648 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

Since June of 2010 Creative Associates International, Inc. (Creative), through Cooperative Agreement (CoAg) 279-A-00-10-00032-00, has been implementing the Community Livelihoods Project (CLP). Three modifications have been made during this 18 month evaluation period, all of which, except Modification No. 02, were for incremental financing. Amendment No. 02 altered the agreements scope of work, but did not extend the Award from its original 36 months with two one-year options. Through USAID/Yemens Yemen Monitoring and Evaluation Project (YMEP) implemented by International Business & Technical Consultants, Inc. (IBTCI), a mid-term evaluation was requested by the Mission. The field work for this report was carried out in January and February 2012 and the evaluation review period covers July 1, 2010 through December 31, 2011. The primary evaluation questions consisted of: Has the CLP implementation mechanism of issuing grants to local awardees been an effective strategy for achieving program results? Have the efforts to include women and youth in the program achieved expected results? Has the program achieved all of the other expected results at mid-term? Has the program been cost effective?