Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(7838 KB)

Evaluation of USAID/Ecuador's Northern Border activities

2012EnglishTitle in header: Evaluation of USAID programs in the Northern Border of Ecuador | Annexes in Spanish | Spanish ed.: PD-ACU-431 Final report Economic growth and developmentCODE: 518; Ecuador Latin America Andean Region

Metadata

Contract/Code
AID-518-O-12-00012
Institution
40264 - SIC DESARROLLO 8538 USAID. Mission to Ecuador
Keywords
Sustainable development | Investment | Economic development | Economic growth | Economic infrastructure | Human capacity development | Provinces | Border areas DA30 Information management, systems and equipment (92.8) | Quality of life (51.7) | Health care (38.4)
ID
PDACU430
File size
7838 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

This document presents the results of an evaluation of USAID's programs' activities in the Northern Border of Ecuador.  This evaluation has three interrelated goals: (1) to examine the sustainability of USAID investments in the period 2001-2011 in order to inform the future evolution of USAID programming, and to improve its effectiveness and impact within the current country context and predicted budget parameters; (2) to establish a proxy for baseline data through the collection of reliable secondary source data which might serve as a future input for a possible impact evaluation; and (3) to assess the feasibility for carrying out an impact evaluation of USAID's overall Northern Border initiative or for component programs.  The three components are: (1) economic-productive development; (2) productive and social infrastructure; and (3) institutional strengthening.  The document also analyses the integrality of the strategy, on the basis that the three pillars of the Programa de Desarrollo de la Frontera Norte (PDFN) intervention sought a common goal of sustainable growth and human development.  A first finding of the evaluation is that USAID coverage on the Northern Border has been broad.  Programa de Desarrollo de la Frontera Norte (PDFN), through its components, has intervened directly in 109 of 129 parishes, where 95% of the total inhabitants of the three provinces subject to this evaluation live.  In addition, PDFN has carried out activities at cantonal level in 19 out of 21 cantons in which the three provinces of the Northern border are divided.  Moreover, the program has been relevant in cross-cutting issues in the implementation of its components and activities, such as gender.  Another finding of the evaluation is that the work carried out by the component of social and productive infrastructure is recognized by the different actors as relevant and of good quality.  (Excerpt, modified)