Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(2038 KB)

USAID/DR tri-project evaluation: Volume III : Dominican sustainable tourism alliance program (DSTA)

2012EnglishTask order no: AID-517-TO-11-00001 | Evaluated project title: Dominican Sustainable Tourism Alliance (DSTA) | V. 1: PD-ACT-994 | V. 2: PD-ACT-996 | Integrated evaluation report: PD-ACT-999 Economic growth and developmentCODE: 517; Dominican Republic Dominica

Metadata

Authors
Vanegas, Manuel | Bermudez, Edith | Church, Phillip
Contract/Code
AID-517-TO-11-00001 | AID-RAN-I-00-09-00008 | RAN-I-00-09-00008-00 | 517-A-00-07-00105-00 | AID-517-A-00-07-00105
Institution
6007 - AMEX International, Inc. 13413 USAID. Bur. for Policy, Planning and Learning. Ofc. of Learning, Evaluation Research
Keywords
Tourist industry | Small scale enterprises | Medium scale enterprises | Community based delivery | Community participation DA30 Small scale enterprises (454.0) | International trade (41.8) | Industry and technology (General and research) (41.6)
ID
PDACT997
File size
2038 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

This performance evaluation presents documented findings that the USAID/DR-funded Dominican Sustainable Tourism Alliance (DSTA) program is making progress if somewhat delayed progress toward reaching its goal of better equipping local small, medium-sized and community-based tourism enterprises and organizations. This outcome is most notable in the nine existing tourism clusters created with USAID support under its earlier Competitiveness and Policy Project (CPP) which offers an alternative vision for sustainable tourism in the Dominican Republic (DR).Further, the evaluation concludes from these findings that the DSTA programs five-component strategy was soundly designed if at times unevenly executed for implementing a cluster approach to developing sustainable community-based organizations and micro, small and medium enterprises that can compete effectively in marketing tourism products and services, including the niche market of eco-tourism. This cluster approach has made noteworthy, if occasionally halting, progress toward achieving the DSTAs five-year life of program targets and is worthy of examination and consideration for replication in other development settings. Still, some design and implementation flaws have emerged, as has been recognized and largely addressed by USAID and DSTA implementing partners during the initial three years of Program execution.