Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(604 KB)

Midterm assessment of the program to support environmental compliance under CAFTA-DR

2009EnglishTask order no. 15 | Project title: Rural and agricultural incomes with a sustainable environment plus (RAISE plus) Environmental policyCODE: 598; Central America Dominican Republic Latin American Regional Guatemala

Metadata

Contract/Code
AEG-I-00-04-00010-00 | AID-AEG-I-00-04-00010
Institution
4304 - Nathan Associates, Inc. | 7239 Weidemann 11325 USAID. Bur. for Economic Growth, Agriculture and trade. Ofc of
Keywords
Environmental protection | Environmental policy | Environmental legislation | Law enforcement | Institutional aspects | Monitoring | Performance indicators | Trade agreements | Compliance RA40 Development program planning and management (875.0) | Environmental management (767.2) | Rule of law (562.5)
ID
PDACO373
File size
604 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

The purpose of the USAID CAFTA-DR Environmental Cooperation Program is to build the capacity of the six CAFTA-DR countries (Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua) to comply with the environmental provisions of the ECA and to promote cooperation in environmental matters. USAID is carrying out activities in four areas: institutional strengthening for implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, biodiversity conservation, market-based conservation, and private sector environmental performance. This report assesses the design and implementation of ongoing and planned activities managed by USAID to build the capacity of institutions in signatory countries of the CAFTA-DR to comply with environmental provisions of the agreement and strengthen environmental protection as it relates to trade. The purpose of the assessment is to provide constructive guidance on implementing existing activities and provide information to inform the programming of FY 08 and FY 09 resources. The assessment presents what CAFTA-DR countries need to build their institutional capacity in order to comply with environmental provisions; identifies opportunities to complement the work of other donors; and recommends ways to improve the program. (Author abstract)