Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(3367 KB)

Mid-term performance evaluation of the strengthening value chains (SVC) activity in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

2021French | EnglishEvaluated project title: Program evaluation for effectiveness and learning (PEEL) Agricultural economicsCODE: 660; Congo Dr [Formerly Zaire] Pr Africa South Of Sahara

Metadata

Contract/Code
AID-OAA-TO-16-00008 | AID-OAA-I-15-00024 | AID-660-C-17-00003
Institution
8414 - ME&A 42111 USAID. Bur. for Resilience and Food Security (RFS)
Keywords
Agricultural production | Capacity | Civil society capacity | Coffee | Economic capacity | Governance | Leadership training | Legumes AE00 Agricultural economics (2110.0) | Agricultural markets (1254.0) | Women in development (1134.0)
ID
PA00XHFJ
File size
3367 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

The USAID/Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) Strengthen Value Chain Activity (SVC) activity aims to increase agricultural production and incomes of small farmers in the dried bean, soybean, and coffee value chains (VCs) in the DRC?s South Kivu province. The SVC mid-term performance evaluation sought to identify achievements, performance issues, and constraints, focusing on SVC?s collaboration with Food for Peace (FFP) and, from this, to identify a set of actionable recommendations to achieve activity goals and objectives for the short, medium, and long-term.

Activity interventions contributed to the increased adoption of improved production and post-harvest practices and increased production, quality, and sales, and to a lesser extent increased market linkages, in the dried bean and coffee VCs. SVC?s gender activities further contributed to the increased adoption of gender practices and gender outcomes by small farmers and their POs. However, numerous challenges remain in the targeted VCs, chief among them the lack of access to quality inputs and finance, lack of horizontal and vertical market linkages, and weak capacity of farmer producer organizations (POs).

SVC has struggled to achieve an integrated ?one-team? approach with the FFP Development Food Security Activities (DFSAs) owing to, among other things, different intervention priorities, contractual restrictions, weak intra-project communication, and poor synchronization of implementation timelines.

The evaluation offers nine primary recommendations and 25 sub-recommendations for USAID/DRC related to staffing and management, capacity building, access to inputs, access to finance, market diversification, strengthening the enabling environment, inter-project coordination, gender, youth, and social engagement, and strengthening VC best practices.