Abstract
The evaluation analyzes the relevance of the intervention?s objectives and strategies, the results achieved, the conditions for sustainability, and the programmatic and technical strengths and weaknesses of each component. Based on this analysis, the evaluation identifies lessons learned and provides recommendations to improve the intervention. The evaluation team utilized qualitative methods to answer five evaluation questions. The evaluation finds that the Activity developed various strategies to reduce the incidence of human trafficking, including evidence production for decision-making, specialized technical assistance and training for justice operators and government professionals who serve victims, and technical assistance and training for the formulation of local policies against trafficking in persons. Furthermore, the Activity has a single integrated model of care for victims of trafficking, which includes an automated case registration and tracking system (SISCALP). However, the evaluation identified internal and external obstacles that are preventing greater achievement of results in the different Activity components. The recommendations are focused on three actors: CHS Alternativo, USAID, and the Peruvian Government.