Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(1023 KB)

Mid-term performance evaluation report : Haiti justice sector strengthening program (JSSP)

2020EnglishEvaluated project title: Justice sector strengthening program (JSSP) Laws and legislationCODE: 521; Haiti Latin America

Metadata

Authors
Lis, John | Jonathas, Noel | Flereme, Pelex
Contract/Code
AID-521-A-15-00009 | AID-521-C-13-00001
Institution
11933 - Social Impact, Inc. 8554 USAID. Mission to Haiti
Keywords
Civic education | Civil society | Governance | Independence | Judges | Judicial reform | Litigation | Rule of law JB60 Democratization (1392.0) | Rule of law (1362.0) | Governance (273.0)
ID
PA00WR9P
File size
1023 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

The Haiti Justice Sector Strengthening Program (JSSP) mid-term performance evaluation examines the ways and extent to which the activity is supporting the professionalization, independence, accessibility, and efficiency of the Haitian justice sector and how JSSP has set the stage for sustainable improvement. Successful interventions demonstrate that the activity is effective at addressing technical problems, while difficulties in promoting judicial independence show that JSSP is less effective in addressing problems with political causes. Support to legal assistance offices provided legal assistance to those who could not afford an attorney, particularly to detainees, and contributed to a reduction in prolonged pretrial detention, a longstanding problem. JSSP sought to support greater efficiency through development of a new criminal code that has not yet been enacted and implementation of a Case Management Information System (CMIS). JSSP encouraged increased Haitian Government ownership of key justice initiatives by promoting reform legislation, legal education reform through Haitian institutions, memoranda of understanding with key governmental bodies, and establishment of agencies to manage legal assistance and CMIS, but it is unclear if the government has sufficient resources to continue JSSP initiatives after the activity ends. JSSP?s effect on professionalization has been limited. Judicial decisions are not independently made, and promoting judicial independence is difficult because politicians do not want to relinquish their control over the judiciary. Despite JSSP interventions, there is a lack of confidence in the formal justice sector. The evaluation report concludes with 11 recommendations for JSSP in its final year.