Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(1822 KB)

Whole-of-project performance evaluation of the reading for success project - Morocco

2020EnglishEvaluated project title: Reading for success Education researchCODE: 608; Morocco Arab Countries

Metadata

Authors
Keaveney, Erika | Monnard, Alexandre | Solum, Kristina | Templeton, Stephanie | Murray, Matthew | Lynd, Mark | McHugh, Casey | Schmenner, Drew
Contract/Code
AID-OAA-M-13-00010 | GS-10F-0033M | AID-608-TO-15-00002 | AID-608-C-17-00001 | AID-608-A-15-000002 | AID-608-TO-16-0001 | GC-10F-0033M | AID-608-A-15-00002
Institution
40818 - NORC at the University of Chicago 13858 USAID. Bur. for Economic Growth, Education and Environment
Keywords
Children | Curriculum | Data analysis | Disabilities | Languages | Life skills | Mathematics | Reading skills EA20 Higher education (2147.95) | Educational delivery (325.0) | Rule of law (141.0)
ID
PA00WK1N
File size
1822 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

This report evaluates the performance of USAID/Morocco?s Reading for Success (RFS) project and its four related activities: RFS-Small Scale Experimentation, RFS-National Program for Reading, RFS-Human and Institutional Capacity Development, and RFS-Improving Deaf Children?s Reading Through Technology. It assesses the extent to which RFS contributed to USAID/Morocco?s Education Development Objective of enhanced educational attainment for children at the primary level. Research questions focus on six key topics: project outcomes; project implementation; inclusion; the role of the Moroccan Ministry of National Education, Vocational Training, Higher Education, and Scientific Research (MoE); sustainability; and lessons learned and recommendations. Evaluators from NORC at the University of Chicago and School-to-School International completed an initial desk review of RFS documents, took part in an evaluation design workshop, analyzed relevant quantitative data, and conducted primary qualitative data collection including key informant interviews and focus group discussions in October 2019. Evaluators found that RFS contributed to key elements of reading instruction; fostered a collaborative relationship between partners and the MoE; may not have addressed the specific needs of certain populations of students; and encountered building blocks as well as obstacles in ensuring sustainability. Evaluators also identified lessons and offered corresponding recommendations in five key areas: MoE?s ownership of education reform; implementation; inclusion; research, monitoring, and evaluation; and community engagement.