Mid-term performance evaluation of the Cambodian civil society strengthening (CCSS) activity : mid-term evaluation final report
2020EnglishEvaluated project title: Cambodian civil society strengthening (CCSS) | COR: Sory But Civil societyCODE: 442; Cambodia
Metadata
- Contract/Code
- 72044219F00002 | AID-486-I-14-00001 | AID-442-C-16-00002
- Institution
- 11933 - Social Impact, Inc. 8523 USAID. Mission to Cambodia
- Keywords
- Access to services | Civic education | Civil society | Governance | Human rights | Local level | Women | Youth JA34 Top/Government and law/Political development/Civil society (273.0) | Top/Government and law/The state/Governance (112.5) | Top/Sociology and psychology/Sociology/Human rights (67.0)
- ID
- PA00WCX6
- File size
- 1297 KB
- Source
- Open PDF
The USAID/Regional Development Mission for Asia contracted Social Impact to conduct a Midterm Evaluation of the Cambodian Civil Society Strengthening (CCSS) Activity from October 2019 to February 2020. Evaluation questions focused on how CSO capacities have changed as a result of the intervention, the effectiveness of CCSS interventions, how CCSS has adapted to mitigate operational risk, and how gender equality and inclusiveness, as well as CSO self-reliance, may be improved. Data collection methods consisted of desk/secondary literature review, Key Informant Interviews, Focus Group Discussions, and Mini Survey.
Most CSOs stated that their capacity had improved overall as a result of CCSS, with the activity?s two funds helping CSOs expand their services to increase access for citizen engagement. Customized coaching, digital security training, and financial management training have specifically catered to the needs of a wide variety of CSO partners. Through CCSS support, CSOs have increased the number of Human Rights Defenders cases they support, but the use of external lawyers on these cases leads to challenges with the other casework of these lawyers. CSOs note that additional support is needed in monitoring and evaluation, outcome reporting, proposal writing, risk planning and mitigation (especially with populations at risk), and funding diversification. CCSS?s results framework, Theory of Change, and indicators should also be reviewed to ensure effective understanding and communication of CCSS impacts and outcomes. Finally, risks for women, youth, and minority groups persist, requiring additional support around gender and social inclusion. The report concludes with recommendations to guide CCSS moving forward.