Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(9649 KB)

Gomal Zam command area development project : midterm performance evaluation

2019EnglishEvaluated project title: Gomal Zam-command area development project (GZD-CADP) Hydrology and water resourcesCODE: 391; Pakistan

Metadata

Authors
Krieger, Douglas | Ul Hasan, Jamshed | Jan, Muhammad Qasim | Nadeem, Samar Erum | Ur Rehman, Zia
Contract/Code
AID-391-C-15-00004
Institution
3970 - Management Systems International, Inc. (MSI) 8588 USAID. Mission to Pakistan
Keywords
Agricultural economics | Agricultural production | Canals | Development projects | Farms | Irrigation | Livestock | Rule of law TC10 Top/Government and law/The state/Rule of law (692.5) | Top/Agriculture/Agricultural enterprises/Farms (386.0) | Top/Agriculture/Agricultural production (298.0)
ID
PA00W7PX
File size
9649 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

In 2015, USAID/Pakistan joined the Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa to implement the Gomal Zam Command Area Development Project. The project sought to improve the agricultural and livestock productivity and incomes of 30,000 farm families by helping them fully realize the benefits of a perennial source of irrigation water. The project is far behind schedule, however, thus deferring much-anticipated benefits.

The evaluation focused on producing recommendations to accelerate implementation and identifying lessons learned to improve the design and implementation of future government-to-government projects. To address this purpose, the evaluation team reviewed a rich set of documents, interviewed a wide range of stakeholders and beneficiaries, and drew from secondary sources to triangulate findings.

The evaluation concludes that a poorly managed design process failed to produce a design document specific enough to effectively guide implementation. Furthermore, staffing and compensation issues embedded in the design left the project without the skills and experience necessary to effectively manage project activities. Because the project has made little meaningful progress on its foundational activities, it generated few benefits. Nevertheless, the evaluation concludes that completing the project has the potential to sustain benefits achieved so far and enhance them substantially.

Recommendations for accelerating implementation focus on bolstering the project?s management capacity, producing detailed work plans, filling staffing gaps, reassessing the suitability of consultants, and managing contracts more tightly. In future government-to-government projects, USAID should take a more hands-on approach to project design and implementation, reserving a role in approving design documents and selecting key personnel and providing short- or long-term technical assistance as necessary