Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(1365 KB)

Evaluation : ex-post evaluation of the sustainable, comprehensive responses for vulnerable children and their families (SCORE) activity in Uganda

2019EnglishEvaluated task order title: Sustainable, comprehensive responses for vulnerable children and their families (SCORE) | Project title: E3 analytics and evaluation Human capacity developmentCODE: 617; Uganda

Metadata

Authors
Peters, Jennifer | Namisango, Eve | Ddumba-Nyanzi, Ismael | Zodrow, Gwynne
Contract/Code
AID-OAA-M-13-00017 | GS-23F-8012H | AID-617-A-11-00001
Institution
11492 - Development & Training Services, Inc. (dTS) | 41179 Palladium Group, 3970 Management Systems International, (MSI) 13858 USAID. Bur. for Economic Growth, Education and Environment
Keywords
Children | Food production | Food security | Households | Knowledge | Learning readiness | Public opinion | Socioeconomic status EH00 Housing (814.5) | Food security (489.6) | HIV AIDS (239.0)
ID
PA00TJ6B
File size
1365 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

This ex-post evaluation examines the sustainability of outcomes from USAID?s Sustainable, Comprehensive Responses for Vulnerable Children and their Families (SCORE) activity. SCORE developed family-specific plans to ?graduate? households from activity support. The activity focused on capacity building, improving socioeconomic status, food security, and access to protection and legal services. The evaluation collected qualitative data from beneficiaries and key stakeholders across seven districts in Uganda.

The evaluation found that households learned new skills and knowledge to help them mitigate their challenges, including village savings and loan associations, home gardening, and farming. However, financial instability remains a common challenge among households, and their circumstances and levels of vulnerability vary widely. About 88 percent of households reported experiencing a shock or stressor in the last year, although nearly 40 percent felt they did not have the ability to handle shocks, and 26 percent felt they could handle shocks but with difficulty. Respondents felt that SCORE did not provide enough support for the most critically vulnerable households (e.g., elderly, disabled).

The evaluation concluded that SCORE?s strengthening of households? skills reduced the impact of shocks and stressors for many households. However, there is a need to examine hindering factors, particularly those beyond the activity?s control such as natural disasters that can have a huge economic impact on households that rely on farming. As one of the first graduation models of its kind, lessons learned from SCORE ? both positive and negative ? require further testing and time, and strong monitoring and evaluation practices to continue to learn from them.