Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(2832 KB)

Evaluation of Amazonia lee reading intervention in Peru : final report

2018Spanish | EnglishEvaluated project title: Amazonia lee (Amazon reads) Basic educationCODE: 527; Peru Latin America Andean Region

Metadata

Authors
Campuzano, Larissa | Fernandez, Camila | Lugo-Gil, Julieta | Glazerman, Steve | Murray, Nancy | Padilla, Ivonne
Contract/Code
AID-OAA-M-12-00020
Institution
764 - Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. 9839 USAID. Bur. for Latin America and the Caribbean. Ofc. of Regional Sustainable Development. Education Human Resources Div.
Keywords
Children | Classrooms | Demonstration | Learning readiness | Literacy | Materials | Mathematics | Students EF10 Educational delivery (542.5) | Occupations (379.0) | Roads and road transport (180.0)
ID
PA00TCQ1
File size
2832 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

This study estimated the impacts of Amazonía Lee, an early grade reading program in Peru delivering in-service teacher training, coaching, and materials as well as leadership training and non-monetary incentives to improve reading instruction. We examined impacts on teaching practices and literacy skills of participating students. We randomly assigned schools to a program group that implemented Amazonía Lee or a control group that did not. The study was conducted in two areas (departments) of the Amazon region. In one department, Ucayali, control schools received the usual services provided by the Ministry of Education. In the other department, San Martín, most control schools received a program known as Soporte Pedagógico, a Ministry initiative that offered teacher training and coaching, pedagogical materials, and remedial tutoring.


In both regions, we found a few impacts on teacher instructional practices, including teachers? increased explanation of different types of texts and greater vocabulary development. The impacts on students differed by region. In Ucayali, Amazonía Lee had positive and substantial impacts on reading outcomes. For example, students in Amazonia Lee on average could read one additional familiar word (7 versus 6, an impact equivalent to 0.24 standard deviations), 3.5 additional invented words (16.8 versus 13.4, an impact on decoding of 0.24 standard deviations), and scored higher on a reading comprehension test (impact of 0.27 standard deviations), with no gender differences. In San Martín, where Soporte Pedagógico was prevalent, we found no impacts on students? reading outcomes relative to the control schools.