Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(1038 KB)

Final evaluation report : final performance evaluation of the integrated financial management system (IFMS) activity

2018EnglishFooter title: IFMS evaluation report | Evaluated task order title: Integrated financial management system (IFMS) | Project title: Haiti evaluation and survey services Financial managementCODE: 521; Haiti Caribbean Latin America

Metadata

Contract/Code
AID-521-C-17-00002 | AID-521-TO-14-00001 | AID-OAA-I-12-00035
Institution
11933 - Social Impact, Inc. 8554 USAID. Mission to Haiti
Keywords
Accountability | Financial management | Governance | Networks | Public administration | Revenues | Security | Transparency PB120 Financial management (1710.05) | Development program and activity evaluation (987.9) | Finance (938.0)
ID
PA00SXH8
File size
1038 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID)/Haiti Integrated Financial Management System (IFMS) activity supported the Government of Haiti (GOH) in developing a system for transparent management of public revenues and expenditures.  This final performance evaluation focused on Phase V of the activity, implemented by Chemonics International from September 2014 to March 2018.  To answer three evaluation questions (EQs) regarding activity effectiveness (EQ 1), utilization (EQ 2), and sustainability (EQ 3), the evaluation team conducted a document review, 20 key informant interviews, 8 group interviews, and site observations including 12 diagnostics.  For EQ 1, the evaluation concluded that infrastructure and systems implementation remain ongoing.  Because the infrastructure is incomplete, aspects of the systems are not being used by intended beneficiaries.  The activity conducted several trainings, but participants have not had opportunities to apply acquired skills.  Connectivity and electricity issues hindered IFMS, as did lack of buy-in from GOH leadership.  For EQ 2, GOH is using IFMS hardware and infrastructure, but not using some of the software applications.  Financial reporting within the GOH remains the same as before this phase, real-time data exchange is not occurring, and gains to improve fiscal transparency were minimal.  For EQ 3, the IFMS intranet and Network Operating Center were the activity's most sustainable aspects, whereas non-infrastructure investments are currently less sustainable.  More training and coaching on the new systems are required.  The activity did not have a sustainability plan or exit strategy in place at the time of the evaluation.  (Author abstract)