Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(2179 KB)

Mid-term theory of change and impact learning evaluation of the farmer-to-farmer program

2017EnglishCover title: Mid-term theory of change and impact learning evaluation of the USAID farmer-to-farmer (F2F) program | Task order title: Feed the future program evaluation for effectiveness and learning (PEEL) Agricultural developmentGhana Latin America East Africa

Metadata

Authors
Muldoon, Michelle Frain | Johnson, Eric | Wendt, Ron
Contract/Code
AID-OAA-TO-16-00008 | AID-OAA-I-15-00024
Institution
8414 - Mendez England and Associates 42111 USAID. Bur. for Resilience Food Security (RFS)
Keywords
Farmers | Farmer training | Human capacity development | Agricultural production | Agricultural development | Volunteers AA30 Agricultural development (2520.0) | Development program and activity evaluation (1518.85) | Agricultural markets (925.2)
ID
PA00N1S6
File size
2179 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

The Farmer-to-Farmer (F2F) Program aims to provide volunteers to host institutions to build their capacity to develop economically and to build awareness of the U.S. Government's role in international development.  Through eight Leader With Associates Cooperative Agreements and one additional Cooperative Agreement, seven implementing partners deploy volunteers in 28 countries at present.  Over the life of F2F, 17,603 volunteer assignments have been completed in 117 countries with 1.4 million farm families as direct beneficiaries, with a value of volunteer services of $105 million.  During the period of FY 2014-2016 30 percent of volunteers were female and 41 percent of trainees were female.  The evaluation undertook a survey of 978 respondents from implementing partners, hosts, and volunteers to ascertain stakeholder perception of the Program.  Over 90 percent of respondents were satisfied with the project due to it being "needs based." This survey was followed up with KIIs with stakeholders in nine countries.  Three main questions were examined through this evaluation: the effectiveness of the theory of change; how well indicators capture the effects of F2F activities; and how well the F2F Program integrates innovation.  (Author abstract)