Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(712 KB)

Performance evaluation of the partnership for growth in El Salvador

2017English"March 20, 2017 (Revised July 24, 2017)" | Project title: E3 analytics and evaluation | Spanish ed.: PA-00N-1HH | Mid-term evaluation: PA-00K-B8W Revised Evaluacion de desempeno del asocio para el crecimiento en El Salvador Economic growth and developmentCODE: 519; El Salvador Philippines Latin America

Metadata

Authors
Jones, James | Morrison, Isaac | Molina, Francisco | MacFadyen, Ann
Contract/Code
AID-OAA-M-13-00017
Institution
3970 - Management Systems International, Inc. (MSI) 13891 USAID. Bur. for Economic Growth, Education and Environment. Ofc. of Policy
Keywords
Economic growth | Accountability | Policy reform | Constraints | Governance | Economic development | Business formation | Business growth | Development assistance DA30 Development program planning and management (671.4) | Democratization (446.0) | Governance (382.2)
ID
PA00MXVM
File size
712 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

This report presents the results of a final performance evaluation of the Partnership for Growth (PFG) in El Salvador, a shared development framework promoting economic growth.  The evaluation used desk review and interview data to answer three questions: (1) what has been the overall impact of PFG in El Salvador, and how did the various lines of action contribute to this outcome?; (2) how did the PFG approach affect the bilateral relationship -- including U.S. Government (USG) and Government of El Salvador program implementation and dialogue -- in each partner country, both in intended and unintended ways?; (3) what best practices and lessons can be learned from the PFG approach to: (a) apply to the bilateral relationship in El Salvador and (b) apply to future USG assistance efforts worldwide? The evaluation team concludes that PFG enabled legislative reform, established new institutions, and supported international agreements.  PFG's approach strengthened bilateral cooperation, improved trust, and directed greater attention to priority issues.  Challenges included the lack of new funding and an excessive number of goals.  There were mixed opinions on the scorecard completion process, and concern that PFG was overly optimistic regarding its potential for effecting change.  The evaluation recommends that U.S. participation in the Growth Council continue, and the council expand to include other actors.  Future multiagency collaborations of this type should empower leadership at the highest levels, and include more coordination resources and centralized recordkeeping.  Similar activities should include the host government at the planning and reporting stages to encourage higher levels of participation.  (Author abstract, modified)