Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(3386 KB)

Performance evaluation of USAID/Pacific Islands global climate change portfolio

2017EnglishAt head of title: Evaluation report | Evaluated project title: Vegetation and land cover mapping and improving food security for building resilience | Evaluated project title: Climate change adaptation program | Evaluated project title: Coastal community adaptation project (C-CAP) | Evaluated project title: Pacific-American climate fund (PACAM) | Project title: USAID Asia learning and M&E support | Project title also known as: Asia learning and monitoring and evaluation (ALME) Climate changeKiribati Solomon Islands

Metadata

Authors
Kramer, John Michael | Azeez, Karen
Contract/Code
AID-492-TO-16-00003 | AID-486-I-14-00001 | AID-ASIA-IO-11-00001 | AID-ASIA-IO-11-00002 | AID-492-C-12-00010 | AID-492-C-13-00017
Institution
11933 - Social Impact, Inc. 8592 USAID. Mission to Philippines | 11460 Regional Development Asia (RDMA)
Keywords
Climate change | Agricultural adaptation | Community based delivery | Resilience | Behavior change | Integrated coastal management | Water supply | Disaster mitigation | Food security | Economic impact RF40 Climate change (1359.15) | Civil society (952.5) | Alternative energy technology (431.1)
ID
PA00MSXM
File size
3386 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID)/Pacific Islands launched its Global Climate Change portfolio in 2011 in response to growing climate concerns.  In 2016, Social Impact, Inc. conducted a performance evaluation on four of 11 portfolio activities (Coastal Community Adaptation Project, Pacific-American Climate Fund, Vegetation and Land Cover Mapping and Improving Food Security, and Climate Change Adaptation Program) across four of 12 portfolio countries (Fiji, Kiribati, Solomon Islands, and Papua New Guinea).  The evaluation included a desk review and five weeks of mixed-methods data collection.  Individually, the activities showed varying degrees of effectiveness in promoting climate change adaptation.  Data from key informants and focus groups suggest that community-based activities with ongoing engagement showed the greatest promise in improving climate resilience.  Activities with shorter timelines or insufficient resources were less likely to achieve positive impacts.  Across the activities, some 60,000 persons will benefit from climate adaptive infrastructure, 24 civil society organizations (CSOs) will have improved implementation capacity, and regional partnerships may increase donor effectiveness.  At the portfolio level, the lack of integration across activities inhibited programmatic synergies.  Activities were not designed in a closely coordinated manner and close start dates left little time to conduct systematic planning.  The evaluation team's recommendations include: (1) current portfolio activities should include a focus on capacity building for subnational (local and provincial) institutions and government; (2) USAID should continue community-based support and maximize the investment made in building a network of high-capacity CSO implementers; and (3) USAID should make funds available for longer periods of performance to increase sustainability.  (Author abstract, modified)