Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(532 KB)

Global sustainable tourism alliance (GSTA) performance evaluation : final report

2014EnglishEvaluated project title: Global sustainable tourism alliance (GSTA) Environmental protection and conservationEcuador Dominican Republic Montenegro Mali Uganda Ethiopia

Metadata

Authors
Hecht, Joy | Mitchell, Arthur
Contract/Code
AID-OAA-TO-13-00040 | AID-RAN-I-00-09-00016 | RAN-I-00-09-00016-00 | AID-EPP-A-00-06-00002 | EPP-A-00-06-00002-00
Institution
1891 - International Business and Technical Consultants, Inc. (IBTCI) 13895 USAID. Bur. for Economic Growth, Education Environment. Ofc. of Land Tenure Resources Management
Keywords
Tourist industry | Sustainable development | Natural resource management | Natural resource conservation | Biological diversity | Economic growth | Governance | Poverty reduction RE00 Environmental protection and conservation (150.35) | Finance (74.0) | Environmental management (71.2)
ID
PA00K43K
File size
532 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

The five-year Global Sustainable Tourism Alliance (GSTA) program promoted, implemented, and supported sustainable tourism interventions in USAID-presence countries, with an emphasis on fragile and transformational states as well as high-biodiversity areas.  These interventions were carried out as collaborative efforts involving the private sector, development institutions, and USAID under a single, global mechanism that used tourism as a means to achieve USAID's objectives of poverty alleviation, economic growth, biodiversity conservation, and improved governance.  GSTA linked biodiversity conservation and ecological resilience to economic development through tourism in a way that had not been tried in USAID conservation or development projects.  USAID decided to conduct this assessment to assess how well this model worked and whether the model could be replicated.  It considered several specific aspects of the alliance, focusing on how the new approaches enabled GSTA to achieve its objectives.  The GSTA evaluation framework addressed how the program achieved its objectives as framed through five evaluation questions: (1) did the differences in the Global Development Alliance (GDA) project development process have any specific effect in the outcomes of the project; (2) how was the SCALE methodology used and to what effect; (3) how did the use of new communication tools and the use of social networking analysis to measure host country collaboration impact results; (4) were biodiversity conservation goals achieved; and (5) were there any gender-related differences or unintended consequences in impacts?  Specific evaluation findings, conclusions and recommendations are provided with detailed analysis for each evaluation question.  (Excerpt, modified)