Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(1057 KB)

Support for international family planning organizations : Population Services International midterm project evaluation

2014EnglishFooter title: PSI-SIFPO : midterm project evaluation | Evaluated project title: Support for international family planning organizations : Population Services International (SIFPO/PSI) | Project title: Global health technical assistance project bridge IV (GH Tech IV) Family planning servicesGuatemala Benin Africa South Of Sahara

Metadata

Authors
Castle, Sarah | Hardtman, Pandora
Contract/Code
AID-OAA-C-13-00113 | AID-OAA-A-10-00030
Institution
11492 - Development & Training Services, Inc. (dTS) 10822 USAID. Bur. for Global Health
Keywords
Family planning | Family planning clinics | Access to services | Integrated health care | Gender analysis | Quality control | Health care costs | Social aspects KL30 Family planning services (745.2) | Community health workers (415.8) | Health care (348.3)
ID
PA00K3WC
File size
1057 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

The Support for International Family Planning Organizations (SIFPO) project mission is to increase the use of family planning (FP) services globally through strengthening selected international FP organizations which have a global reach and an extensive, multi-country network of FP clinics, in order to achieve maximum program impact and synergies.  The current project is working toward the following four results areas: (1) strengthened organizational capacity to deliver quality FP services to target groups; (2) internal quality assurance standards and results quantified and disseminated to strengthen FP performance at a global level; (3) increased organizational sustainability of country-level programs, including internal south-to-south support and technical assistance; and (4) gender-sensitive FP services targeting youth strengthened at a global level.  The evaluation questions are, but are not limited to: (1) what evidence exists that core resources invested in organizational strengthening have improved country-level platforms and programming; (2) what has been the effect on organizational capacity; (3) is there evidence that there is increased sustainability; (4) how have management practices within the organization been affected; (5) is there evidence that the internal quality assurance standards have been disseminated to strengthen FP service delivery and performance at a global level; and (6) to what extent is the PSI project's portfolio of service delivery activities meeting the needs of stakeholders?  Specific evaluation findings, conclusions and recommendations are provided with detailed analysis for each evaluation question.  (Excerpt, modified)