Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(1483 KB)

Impact evaluation for the USAID/Aprender a ler project in Mozambique : year 1 (midline) IE/RCT report

2014English"Deliverable 7" | Footer title: USAID/Aprender a ler impact evaluation : midline report | Evaluated project title: Aprender a ler (ApaL) = Learn to read | Portuguese ed.: PA-00J-ZK8 Avaliacao de impacto do projecto USAID/aprender a ler em Mocambique : ano 1 (meio termo) relatorio IE/RCT Basic educationCODE: 656; Mozambique India

Metadata

Contract/Code
AID-656-TO-12-00002 | AID-RAN-I-00-09-00016 | RAN-I-00-09-00016-00 | AID-656-C-12-00001 | AID-656-TO-12-0000
Institution
1891 - International Business and Technical Consultants, Inc. (IBTCI) 8580 USAID. Mission to Mozambique | 13413 Bur. for Policy, Planning Learning. Ofc. of Learning, Evaluation Research
Keywords
Educational development | Reading instruction | Reading skills | Preschool education | Access to education | Basic education | Learning motivation | Learning readiness | Primary schools | Enrollment EF10 Teacher education (1640.8) | Reproductive health care (192.0) | Labor economics (32.5)
ID
PA00JZK7
File size
1483 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

Previous evaluations in Mozambique such as the one conducted by the Aga Khan Foundation in Cabo Delgado, have called attention to the low level of reading skills in the initial grades.  To address this concern, the Ministry of Education (MINED) and USAID/Mozambique decided to collaboratively implement an intervention project, USAID/Aprender a Ler (ApaL), to improve reading skills in the early grades.  ApaL is conceptualized as an evidence-based reading instruction program coupled with an impact evaluation (IE) designed to estimate the impact of ApaL on reading outcomes as measured by the Early Grade Reading Assessment (EGRA).  This is the second of four reports that comprise the Impact Evaluation of the ApaL project.  The IE is designed as a randomized controlled trial and uses a counterfactual -- e.g., a control group similar to the treatment groups -- to estimate what would have happened without the intervention.  The main objective of this report is to compare results obtained by students in full and medium treatment groups to those in control schools that did not have the benefit of ApaL and to attempt to answer the question of what would likely have happened without the benefit of the project.  In addition, the report compares scores obtained at midline and at baseline and discusses the relationships between specific variables such and sex, province, location of the school and characteristics of students, teachers, directors and classrooms that could affect student performance on the early grade reading assessment (EGRA).  In spite of the abbreviated implementation of ApaL in 2013, it appears that the project has the potential to improve student reading skills as shown by the comparisons between control and treatment groups at midline (see Tables 1 and 2).  Major impacts are observed in second grade in letter recognition and familiar word reading.  Third grade pattern is not as clear although letter recognition is significantly improved in Zambezia.  The benefits accrued by the students in full and medium groups are summarized in detailed analysis in this impact evaluation report.  (Excerpt, modified)