Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(1341 KB)

Mid-term performance evaluation of USAID/Georgia good governance in Georgia (G3) project : final report

2014EnglishCover title: Mid-term performance evaluation of the good governance in Georgia (G3) program | 'Prepared under RFTOP No. SOL-114-I-13-00001' | Evaluated project title: Good governance in Georgia (G3) DemocratizationCODE: 114; Georgia Central And Eastern Europe Caucasus

Metadata

Contract/Code
AID-114-TO-14-00002 | AID-114-I-13-00001 | AID-114-TO-11-00001 | AID-DFD-I-00-08-00072 | DFD-I-00-08-00072-00 | SOL-114-I-13-00001
Institution
8414 - Mendez England and Associates 9620 USAID. Regional Mission for the Caucasus
Keywords
Governance | Local level | Political development | Transparency | Accountability | Public awareness | Political participation | Political leadership | Elections JA31 Democratization (2616.0) | Political development (586.6) | Governance (456.75)
ID
PA00JVTR
File size
1341 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

The objective of the Good Governance in Georgia (G3) program was to strengthen citizens' ability to combat corruption and put into place stronger mechanisms and systems that prevent opportunities for corruption from developing.  The overall purpose of the evaluation was to provide the USAID Office of Democracy and Governance (D&G) and the wider USAID Mission with information that will assist them in making decisions about on-going and related future programming.  The evaluation focused on the first two components of G3: component 1, which relates to improved public administration at the federal level; and component 2, which supports a more responsive, professional, and engaged local governance. Per USAID’s request, component 3 was not evaluated.  An integral part of the evaluation mission was to answer a set of three pre-determined questions, which are detailed in the body of this report.  The questions concern: (1) impact of G3 on government transparency and accountability;(2) effectiveness of G3 on government mechanisms for public engagement; and,(3) sustainability and impact of G3’s capacity development for government officials.