Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(1467 KB)

Revitalizing agricultural/pastoral incomes and new markets, Oromia and Somali Region, Ethiopia : final evaluation

2014EnglishProject title: Revitalizing agricultural/pastoral incomes and new markets for enhanced resilience and recovery (RAIN+) | Earlier project title: Revitalizing agricultural/pastoral incomes and new markets (RAIN) Agricultural marketsCODE: 663; Ethiopia

Metadata

Authors
Celebic, Zlatan
Contract/Code
DFD-A-00-09-00087-00 | AID-DFD-A-00-09-00087
Institution
13649 - Mercy Corps 624 USAID. Ofc. of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA)
Keywords
Agricultural production | Communities | Drought damage | Economic development | Income | Livestock | Rain | Rural areas AE20 Markets (531.3) | Water supply and sanitation (245.65) | Water supply engineering (244.8)
ID
PA00JSRQ
File size
1467 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

At first named RAIN (Revitalizing Agricultural/Pastoral Incomes and New Markets) and RAIN+ (Revitalizing Agricultural/Pastoral Incomes and New Markets for Enhanced Resilience and Recovery) in later phases, the relief-to-development program design aimed to comprehensively promote early recovery and increase resilience to external shocks in selected areas of the Somali and Oromia regions.  It addressed the immediate needs of drought affected populations while also providing communities with skills and opportunities to reduce the impact of future droughts, violent conflict, and other outside barriers to development.  The project therefore aimed to: (1) prevent food insecurity and livelihoods collapse via improved preparedness; and (2) protect existing productive asset base to strengthen and diversify livelihoods; and promote market-based business models, local economic development, and economic integration and trade with neighbors. RAIN's experience has demonstrated that even when environmental, economic, political and social conditions are stressed, market systems are dynamic and continue to operate in the stressed state.  In addition to this, it has shown that even in the most complex and strained environments, if market systems are supported to overcome key obstacles, the private sector responds to opportunities and incentives to bring change to markets that work for the poor.  This experience also indicates that  subsidized service provisions have a distorting effect, undermining the viability of existing or emerging private sector investment.  In order to prevent this, relief operations should be designed to meet immediate needs while minimizing distortions, avoiding undermining long-term programming and contributing to positive market system change, if possible.  (Excerpt, modified)