Skip to content
← Back to SearchPDF(1314 KB)

The leadership development for family planning/reproductive health for political office holders, traditional and religious leaders project : end-of-project performance evaluation final report

2014EnglishEvaluated project title: Leadership development for family planning/reproductive health for political office holders, traditional and religious leaders | Project title: Monitoring and evaluation management services II (MEMS II) | Project title also known as: Nigeria monitoring and evaluation management services II (NMEMS II) Family planning behaviorNigeria Niger Ghana Africa South Of Sahara

Metadata

Contract/Code
620-M-00-11-00001-00 | AID-620-M-00-11-00001 | GPO-A-00-04-00021-00 | AID-GPO-A-00-04-00021
Institution
8360 - The Mitchell Group, Inc. (TMG) 8586 USAID. Mission to Nigeria
Keywords
Birth | Child health care | Children | Communities | Family health care | Rural areas | Space | Women KL20 Maternal child health care (5396.4) | Reproductive health care (3416.0) | Health facilities (2307.9)
ID
PA00JP52
File size
1314 KB
Source
Open PDF

Abstract

The leadership development for family planning/reproductive health for political office holders, traditional and religious leaders project developed leadership and improved the enabling environments for Family Planning and Reproductive Health (FP/RH) in northern Nigeria.  This project was a behavioral change communications and advocacy activity.  It was designed to develop messages about FP/RH that were more acceptable within the communities where the project operated (in the states of Niger, Sokoto and Zamfara), and then deliver those messages through traditional and religious leaders.  It also developed a consensus among political leaders on the importance of FP/RH issues, and these trained leaders then built human capacity, renovated health facilities, and advocated for more adequate funding.  The evaluation team undertook a qualitative assessment and designed a data collection and analysis approach to answer the following four evaluation questions: (1) to what extent has the project achieved its objective of improving the enabling environment for FP/RH in the three target states, (2) which advocacy activities were successful and had a positive impact and which ones had no or limited impact, and why, (3) what roles did traditional, religious and political leaders play in improving the enabling environment for FP/RH in the target states, and how has the development Research Projects Center (dRPC) contributed to this [and] how were these roles different for traditional/religious and political leaders in terms of effectiveness; and, (4) what effect did the project’s activities have on women and men from the community differently?  The team found all the output indicators have been achieved except for two, i.e., public proclamations in support of RH/birth spacing by the political leaders (PLs) and traditional and religious leaders (TRLs), and mentoring.  (Excerpt, modified)